PRIVATE PARTY DEBATES AUTHORIZED BY MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES TO ADDRESS MUNICIPAL ISSUES

Proposal: That [an interested organization] propose that there be a debate between it and an organization calling for the removal of the monument. The resolution for example, could be “Should the statue of Gen. Robert E Lee be removed?” This proposed debate should not be oral, but should be in writing. (In this way, each statement or response could be reviewed by the contesting organizations prior to posting.) (There could also be a subsequent oral debate, not necessarily representing the views of these contesting organizations.) Instead of time limitations, there would be word count limitations. The transcript/video would be posted online.

In deciding on this issue, the Mayor/City Council could consider such debate. If they decide to remove the statue/painting, the transcript of such debate could be part of the record for that decision. If they decide to retain the statue/, it could still serve the same purpose. Reference to such debate would be made at the site of the monument. In such a way, the opponents to the monument would have their say. But the supporters of the monuments would also have their say, and would help explain why, notwithstanding the opposition, the monuments were retained.